Wednesday 15 October 2008

Liturgical matters

More news from Rome, again from Zenit:

Holy See Approves 3 Alternative Closing Messages

VATICAN CITY, OCT. 14, 2008 ( The Holy See has approved three alternatives to "Ite, missa est," the final words said by the priest at Mass.Cardinal Francis Arinze, prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments, today notified the participants in the synod of bishops on the word of God about the new alternatives. The final message is currently rendered in English: "The Mass is ended, go in peace."
Benedict XVI has approved the alternatives, which were requested at the 2005 synod on the Eucharist to express the missionary spirit that should follow from the celebration of Mass.

According to Cardinal Arinze, the Pope had asked for suggestions to be presented. The congregation received 72, from which they prepared nine proposals. The Holy Father has chosen three.

The alternatives are in the revised third "editio typica" of the Roman Missal, which was printed last week, the cardinal said.

The alternatives are:

--"Ite ad Evangelium Domini nuntiandum"
--"Ite in pace, glorificando vita vestra Dominum"
--"Ite in pace" with "alleluia, alleluia" added during Easter season.

In English, these could be rendered along the lines of "go to announce the Gospel of the Lord"; "go in peace, glorifying the Lord with your lives"; and simply, "go in peace (alleluia, alleluia)."

The original Latin final message, "Ite, missa est," has not been modified.

Eucharistic compendium

Cardinal Arinze also announced that a Eucharistic compendium, also suggested by the '05 synod on the Eucharist, is nearly finished.

The book will define Eucharistic doctrine, benediction, Eucharistic holy hours, adoration, and prayers before and after Mass, he explained.

The cardinal further said that the Holy See, at the request of the Pope and the 2005 synod, is studying the most adequate moment during the Mass for the sign of peace.

The Holy Father indicated that episcopal conferences should consider two options: either before the "Agnus Dei" or after the Prayers of the Faithful. Each bishops' conference is to respond by the end of October, though there is a three-week grace period for late responses. The proposals will then be presented to the Holy Father, who will make a decision on the matter.

Finally, Cardinal Arinze announced that his congregation is preparing a volume with thematic materials for homily, with the aim of assisting and supporting priests throughout the world with their preaching.


PeterHWright said...

"The Mass is ended. Go forth and do battle with the devil, the world and the flesh" would have been more to my liking.

Pastor in Monte said...

—and Ite Missa est, to mine!

df said...

I love the Pope and what he's done for the Latin Rite in his short reign so far... but do we really need more options? And do we really need to change the moment of the Pax? I think it's a fine thing that the Pax is proclaimed to the people once the Lord has descended to the Altar (which of course is shown more clearly still in the EF).

Vernon said...

Unless, in the OF, the Pax is to be drastically reformed and confined to the Sanctuary (as it is in the EF) then it is better to move this highly disruptive element away from the solemn celebration of the Canon of the Mass and place it with the other OF frivolity the Prayers of the Faithful (Bidding Prayers).

The Cardinal said...

One reason that liturgists for years have been saying that the sign of peace should come before the presentation of gifts is nothing more than Jesus's own words: "Before you bring your gift to the altar, go and be reconciled with your brother or sister and then bring your gift...." - scarcely a frivolity. Similarly, the Oratio Universalis (aka Bidding Prayers, not a very good term) is far from a frivolity but simply bringing back into the rite what was already there before mediaeval developments started to skew things.

df: It's unwise to talk about the Lord descending to the altar. Re-read Paul VI's Mysterium fidei (1965) on "modes of presence", and think (for example) about the Real Presence in the liturgical assembly ("Where two or three are gathered in me name...") or in the Proclamation of the Word, to name but two of many. Your phraseology could imply that the Lord is not present before the words of consecration, which is simply untrue.

Anonymous said...

The neutral, non-denominational, totally secular "Go in peace" will dominate.